Wednesday, May 29, 2013
misc. musings- Alternate Universes, and why people complain.
I will start off by saying that this is actually something I want replies/feedback on.
The idea spawned this morning while I was mulling over the various responses to Star Trek: Into Darkness. So many people have divided opinions on the execution of this latest film, something which in my observation has been viewed by fans as "not true to the originals", or "just not as good". I wanted to spark some discussion about why people either dislike the specific rules that are being constructed in this new Star Trek, which is no different than Ultimate Comics' tweaks of the Marvel Universe--or no different than the oft-seen Earth Two in DC comics.
But as I began thinking of other examples, it occurred to me exactly how frequent the trend has become in various Sci-Fi mediums, and while I have no problem accepting it and running with the idea, some people seem so offended that a writer or director has "impurified" a source material that it sparks some innate anger in a reader/fan/obsessor---and that got me thinking.
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Reel Review: Star Trek, into brilliance.
Having a Star Trek film get so highly criticized has been a double-edged sword. so I'm going to do this review in two parts.
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Stage Sense: Live Theater/Experimental Theater
I just wanted to take a moment to share this link with you all.
http://fuckyeahgreatplays.tumblr.com/post/49775395174/i-know-some-of-you-geek-out-over
Apparently, a theater group not too far from where I live is doing this fresh concept for an interactive theater piece!!
I've not yet had the honor to attend "Sleep No More" which is one of the more famous examples, but the gist is this: Audiences in attendance will be able to not only view, but actually participate in this evening of the arts. I have submitted to the email address listed in the link with the hope of attending.
I've been involved in plenty of environmental theater in my time here in NYC and I think that anyone bold enough to tackle such concepts should be given respect just for the courage to undertake the activity; Skepticism comes in a variety of forms and I think many theatergoers are jaded to the idea; We've all been to a kitschy restaurant that was "interactive theater", but to do so demands a versatility to keep things interesting, and a fortitude to do so night after night. That being said in restaurants it's rarely executed well. But to incorporate audience members into a fully-realized production, and a brand new one at that, means a whole lot more. I've been working with a theater company for a couple years now and we've had a version of this concept (though very different in execution) that gets bandied about every six months or so, a long-simmering idea.
I applaud these gentlemen and ladies, and I eagerly await a chance to see what they've done. If you're in the NYC area and want to find out more, you can click the link at the top of this post.
However since I haven't seen it yet, I can't end this post with a rating; Instead, let me open it up to comments!! What was the coolest/weirdest/most interesting piece of interactive theatre that you have ever been privy to?
http://fuckyeahgreatplays.tumblr.com/post/49775395174/i-know-some-of-you-geek-out-over
Mrs. Mayfield… is part play, part party, in which a group of former classmates (now all pushing thirty) reunite for a night of drinks and nostalgia. As people revert to their more childish sides, Lord of the Flies-style, what follows is a battle for affection, power, and ownership of memories. Also: nineties music!
Audience members will be fellow guests at the party, with the freedom to wander the space (Sleep No More-style), and have complete control over how interactive the experience is for them: a red nametag means, “Don’t talk to me,” while a green nametag indicates, “Yes, interact with me.”
Apparently, a theater group not too far from where I live is doing this fresh concept for an interactive theater piece!!
I've not yet had the honor to attend "Sleep No More" which is one of the more famous examples, but the gist is this: Audiences in attendance will be able to not only view, but actually participate in this evening of the arts. I have submitted to the email address listed in the link with the hope of attending.
I've been involved in plenty of environmental theater in my time here in NYC and I think that anyone bold enough to tackle such concepts should be given respect just for the courage to undertake the activity; Skepticism comes in a variety of forms and I think many theatergoers are jaded to the idea; We've all been to a kitschy restaurant that was "interactive theater", but to do so demands a versatility to keep things interesting, and a fortitude to do so night after night. That being said in restaurants it's rarely executed well. But to incorporate audience members into a fully-realized production, and a brand new one at that, means a whole lot more. I've been working with a theater company for a couple years now and we've had a version of this concept (though very different in execution) that gets bandied about every six months or so, a long-simmering idea.
I applaud these gentlemen and ladies, and I eagerly await a chance to see what they've done. If you're in the NYC area and want to find out more, you can click the link at the top of this post.
However since I haven't seen it yet, I can't end this post with a rating; Instead, let me open it up to comments!! What was the coolest/weirdest/most interesting piece of interactive theatre that you have ever been privy to?
Labels:
awesome,
fuckyeahgreatplays,
live theater,
NYC,
staged play
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Forwards
I'm trying to get my writing up, and I have this outlet.
I can tell based on daily views that people are seeing this blog, but not commenting.
So, silent viewership. What constructive criticism would you offer me? What can I do to make this blog more enticing to you all?
Leave comments below or message me through G+. I'd really like to hear your thoughts.
I can tell based on daily views that people are seeing this blog, but not commenting.
So, silent viewership. What constructive criticism would you offer me? What can I do to make this blog more enticing to you all?
Leave comments below or message me through G+. I'd really like to hear your thoughts.
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Scott Summers: boyscout or badass?
Why so many people feel the need to crap on Scott Summers is not beyond me, but it is frustrating. I'll admit that he has been discarded and mishandled by one too many a writer since the early days (let's be serious, since the Dark Phoenix Saga, almost). But today I'm going to point out some of the reasons you might be in the wrong for hating him.
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Comic Book Corner: "New Adjective'd Spider-Man"
Alright, it's safe to say that you shouldn't even bother reading this unless you're willing to read spoilers, or you've already read Amazing Spider-Man #698-700.
Last call, half-nerds. SPOILERS from here on down.
Friday, June 22, 2012
Prometheus: Burning questions, burning desire.
I suppose this is as good as any a film to reel me back into using this blog...
MASSIVE SPOILERS AND DISCUSSION AHEAD
Dear reader, be you fictional or fickle, I must start by saying that you should feel free to comment at the bottom. In fact, I encourage it! if you think I'm dead wrong, don't just make faces at your screen. whip out your fastest typing fingers and tell me what you think. I really want to know. I've been sitting on this for three weeks, avoiding ALL spoilers (deceptively challenging) and now 'tis time to catch up.
Where to begin.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
+2 creative drama. Protection against sarcasm +1

When I first got the invite for tickets to "She Kills Monsters", I wasn't entirely sure what I was in for. Because seriously....how does one attempt to stage a play that tackles the topic of D&D?
Well I found my answer this evening at the Flea theatre, down in tribeca. I wouldn't say it was a "critical hit" but it certainly dealt a formidable blow.
The basic premise is that adult Angie never truly got to know her kid sister-and when Angie's entire family is killed in a crash, she is forced to acknowledge that she won't be able to ever again. But upon cleaning out the family's home, she comes across her younger sister's Dungeons & Dragons notebook- a collection of the adventures young Tilly was immersed in up until her death.
This then is our gateway to a surreal fantasy storytelling, full of adventure, profanity, genetalia jokes and surprisingly beneath it all a really great core message---that sometimes a kid needs an escape outlet like their imagination and there's nothing wrong in admitting who you are deep down; But first let's hit the humor.
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Lore, Everlasting

The first musical Revival of the new season has arrived---and confidently put its foot down as a strong, vibrant contender for the Awards season.
Let’s jump to the scrutiny-
“it’s a revival! GODSPELL is classic. Why bother going if I've seen it before?” Well, imaginary reader o’mine, Stephen Schwartz has completely re-tooled the score and book. Updating it and giving it new life and new sounds.
“it’s a revival! GODSPELL is classic. Why bother going if I've seen it before?” Well, imaginary reader o’mine, Stephen Schwartz has completely re-tooled the score and book. Updating it and giving it new life and new sounds.
And. It. Is. Wonderful.
A balance of ballad and blasting rock, to everything in between, we see a new look at an old favorite, achieving what American Idiot and Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson fell short of truly encapsulating, in their attempts to make Broadway rock, while keeping its core concerns. The band is scattered around the audience seating, and the pianist planted center stage has as much fun (and occasionally sneaks in his own laughs) as the cast. This piece is very fluid in its humor and its music, and it is very clear that this cast has grown to work as-one, a small circle that brings 100+% every time they take the stage.
From the get-go, this In-the-round production of GODSPELL launches into a prologue entirely vocal-driven; from philosophy to cell phones, we are given a full spread of colors, in costumes that harken back to the original production without copying--- In fact, the choice to ‘clothe’ Jesus in not typical robes, Superstar garb, or even Original Godspell superman tee-shirt but instead opt for a baby-blue baseball jersey, we are firmly informed that this is a Messiah who’s ushering in his storytelling right here in the New Millenium. The age-appropriate cast, which I would mark no older than twenty-six years of age at most, brings an enthusiasm that would seem forced if a larger-name-filled or more-expected-broadway-aged cast were to have been in its place. The youths bring enough gravity to act Two and enough vibrancy to act One that you have a wonderful combination of story and spectacle.
The first act enables a truly terrific ensemble to showcase voice, humor, and parable while pummeling the audience with a rapid-fire string of Pop Culture references, all tasteful if silly at times. While you’re growing to enjoy this cast, the traditional lessons brought by Jesus (played with utter sincerity and engaging, wholehearted eagerness by Hunter Parrish in his powerful return to Broadway) are modernized just enough that the younger audiences can learn via metaphor while those more versed in the text can appreciate a wink and a nudge to the necessity of these nuggets of wisdom in our current society.
After starting act two with a roundhouse of fun (this reviewer was treated to an amazing rarer performance by amazing swing Julia Mattison stealing the first beltings and having a blast as you’re guided back in after intermission), we return to the meat and bones of the Passion of the Christ, uniquely portrayed and while simple, very raw and pointed in its execution. I am not one to enforce a religion on anyone, and I don’t aim to here; but , whether Christian in faith or not, this stage spectacle is a wonderful treat- and if you’re a fan of the original, and a music lover, then do yourself a favor and see what Stephen is refreshing- this graffiti’d god is a new coat of paint on a sure thing.
I won't divulge the pop culture bits as I'd rather you see the show for yourself and appreciate the surprises this cast offers. Suffice to say that the creative use of set, and reimagined musical interpretation paired alongside a recognizable show should sway new theatregoers to a positive future of broadway (if any other famous minds are willing to re-approach material like Schwartz has, here) while regulars will not be disappointed in the least by a far-from-droll revival that bounds onstage, gets your toe tapping, and lets your mind appreciate the intricacy.
One thing's for sure- this production of Godspell is here to play.
five out of five Proverbs.

Friday, June 17, 2011
Movie Musings: Green Lantern

(Alternate title- Green Eggs and Hal)
The old adage goes, you can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.
Never before has a phrase been so loaded as the attempt to put ANY comic book film into words. I think I’ve been holding off on reviews, thus far, in this approaching Summer of the Comic Book Geek for a sole reason; this one is the one I feared the most in terms of its success. It was every comic book geek’s personal parallax…would this film be as terrible as we feared?
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
TV Thoughts: SGU's 'finale'
Shows on television have a lot of expectations to live up to. They have to either fit a very specific mold, or break that same mold; And a lot of them fail to do so to the dismay, anger, or sometimes satisfaction of their scathing critics...the average viewer.
I won't try and sway you or berate you, the open-minded reader, with why you should have watched this show and maybe have had a hand in staving off its untimely cancellation.
But what I will do is give you some insights to a show that should have lasted awhile longer, and had its legs cut out from under it before its proper time had come.
Friday, April 8, 2011
TV thoughts: spy games
when, exactly, did government agencies, specialty cops, and spies become so populous on TV?
okay, somewhat rhetorical question. I will always prefer Fox Mulder to Jack Bauer, but it seems to me that everywhere I look there's another one. Whether it's philosophy and forensics or just friday night fodder, there's always a badge and a gun onscreen.
okay, somewhat rhetorical question. I will always prefer Fox Mulder to Jack Bauer, but it seems to me that everywhere I look there's another one. Whether it's philosophy and forensics or just friday night fodder, there's always a badge and a gun onscreen.
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Comic Corner: Age of X miniseries
There's something about alternate-universe comic books.
Whether it's simply a sense of "through the looking glass" or some deep desire to savor the twisted perversions of what classic comic book characters can become, i will always read through, and have now often found myself dropping money on, the intricate and unique beauty of a Parallel Reality.
Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. whether we're talking more classic examples of "Star Trek" or simply a bold, brave new step in storytelling, the writers who dare to dream differently have always gotten a little more respect from me for trying something new.
Friday, March 25, 2011
Movie Musing Sucker Punch

Of all the Zach Snyder films I’ve seen to date, I think Sucker Punch ranks in the top slot.
One must assume going in, however, that the plot will be thin or convoluted, the beauties be scantily clad, the visuals stunning, and the ending scene bordering on unbearably preachy; And as always these things hold true to some degree. “Watchmen” did it with about 85 % faithful respect to the original text, and “300” was a very pretty animating of Frank Miller’s bloody take on the greek history. But those films, to me, were lessened in quality by Snyder’s attempts to put his own stamp on someone else’s story.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
TV Thoughts: In Treatment
hey folks! been awhile, I know. but I've got another fine show to recommend, one that not enough people I know are familiar with.
today's installment, we'll cover In Treatment.

HBO has a fine quality to their dramas, they manage to lure you in and keep you hooked with the more average-life qualities and somehow creating some compelling dramas with them. I'm thinking primarily of Six Feet Under, here. Not everyone can find a show about a family running a funeral home 'exciting' but yet it's utterly entrancing, to this writer.
"In Treatment" is another fine example. Gabriel Byrne (probably best known for Usual Suspects) stars as a therapist, Paul Weston, and the weekly installments have a fun little twist; each episode is only about twenty minutes to half-an-hour long. they cover the various patients he has on a weekly basis, and his interactions with them. So, while you've got forty episodes on your hands, in reality you're only watching about eight weeks of therapy, intensely personal, with five different clients.
today's installment, we'll cover In Treatment.

HBO has a fine quality to their dramas, they manage to lure you in and keep you hooked with the more average-life qualities and somehow creating some compelling dramas with them. I'm thinking primarily of Six Feet Under, here. Not everyone can find a show about a family running a funeral home 'exciting' but yet it's utterly entrancing, to this writer.
"In Treatment" is another fine example. Gabriel Byrne (probably best known for Usual Suspects) stars as a therapist, Paul Weston, and the weekly installments have a fun little twist; each episode is only about twenty minutes to half-an-hour long. they cover the various patients he has on a weekly basis, and his interactions with them. So, while you've got forty episodes on your hands, in reality you're only watching about eight weeks of therapy, intensely personal, with five different clients.
Monday, October 11, 2010
TV Thoughts: Sherlock

They say you can't teach an old dog new tricks.
tell that to the Great Detective.
the new BBC series, "Sherlock", balks that old axiom in a manner both brassy and gleeful; Taken from actual Holmes texts and repositioned in a modern context, this is a Sherlock Holmes for the 21st Century.
In a manner of speaking, this "series" is quite interesting; They've recreated an origins approach to the classic pairing of one eccentric detective and one old soldier with a slant for medicine --excellently executed by Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman -- and gives us a faithful interpretation of our adventurers.
the series is currently set to premiere in the US later this month, but avid fans can find the UK's airdates from earlier this summer. Rather than a longer, drawn-out season, the writers have opted to have three 90-minute episodes, a format which has only whetted this viewer's appetite for more such runs.
Monday, September 20, 2010
TV Thoughts: Rubicon
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
REWIND: Plunkett & Macleane

Every once in awhile, I'll stumble across a movie that catches my eye simply by the plot or the actor combination; this one managed to do both, and so I'll kick off a new branch of reviews called "Rewind", namely movies that are over a decade old that I want to recommend because most likely you've never heard of 'em.
Plunkett and Macleane is a film that tries to be a handful of things. I'll call its category, "neoclassical-punk", as it has undertones of a modern action film while also being a period piece. Other films that have a feel such as this might include the recent "Sherlock Holmes" film, the "Marie Antoinette" awhile back, or Baz Luhrman's "Romeo&Juliet". Basically, the category is any sort of classical-era film that seems to have late-20th-century action style and music underscoring that still keeps the feel of the piece but brings it to a vibrant, loud-rock life with its energy and soundtrack.
The story, in essence, is about two Englishmen, a brilliant thief and a penniless gentleman, who manage to escape their condemed fates, build a new and wealthy and solid reputation for themselves, and use it as a cover to steal from the rich.
First off, let's look at the casting. Johnny Lee Miller (Trainspotting, Eli Stone) is very charming as the wannabe-Gentleman, one Jamie Macleane, and it's clear to see that his prettyboy looks are the perfect tool for their activities. then there's Plunkett, played wonderfully by Robert Carlyle, a growing favorite in my book. He's got the plan and the chip on his shoulder and the streetsmart experience to continue a life of crime, and I like the energy these two leads have with each other. There's a hint of a Rosencrantz/Guildenstern in their banter, and certainly a few chuckles along the way. Liv Tyler's stereotypical breathy ingenue is played to the proper levels as a girl-with-a-taste-for-bad-boys. And you've got Alan Cumming, Ken Stott, and Michael Gambon rounding out the rest of the important characters. All in all, a treat to watch.
The film's flaws are really in the clash between action and Period, something all of these "neo-classic-punk" genre films struggle with, is that the modern-rock music sometimes completely pulls you out of the action, even if its tone fits the moment in which it's happening. In some moments, the action is a little too flashy for the period, and you quietly wonder if it would even be possible for things to go down like they do (I'm looking at you, fireworks heist) but you let it slide as the pacing is quite strong and you're thankful nothing is too dragged-out or awkward.
At other moments, the monotony of the elaborate dressing and the complicated group dances and the simplicity of travel and weaponry are perfectly executed, with a touch of grim humor as you feel for Plunkett's feeling out-of-place in this world of sneers and lordships. The heists themselves are sloppy and quick, which is entirely believable.
Regardless, the good moments and the bad moments are fairly well-balanced and overall I liked this movie. I don't feel that it's brilliant but it certainly stands in a tiny category with its brass balls swinging, unafraid and bold as the heroes it boasts of within.
Three and a Half out of Four nooses.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



